Background to the cycle routes
In summer 2020, Harrow council created 3 temporary cycle lanes following Government guidance to rapidly improve walking and cycling infrastructure in order to prevent a car-led recovery post pandemic. Harrow’s Streetspace measures are described in more detail here.
The new cycle lanes were implemented along brief dual carriageway sections of roads that are mostly single carriageway. They are on cycle desire lines and are part of routes that were were originally proposed by Harrow council in the 2013 Vision for Cycling, under Councillor Susan Hall’s Conservative administration.
Prior to implementation of the cycle lanes, these roads were extremely dangerous for cycling. When the schemes were first implemented, we submitted recommendations to the council on cheap and quick interventions to make the junctions safer, and join up the lanes to cycle routes in the surrounding area. There was no funding available at the time to progress these interventions, but this could be done as part of a permanent scheme.
Some motorists have complained that the cycle lanes take away space from cars, but in fact these dual carriageway sections are too short to provide any additional useful motor traffic capacity (as the roads are single carriageway at either end).
Why are these cycle routes important?
- Safe, convenient cycle routes are essential in order to enable people to cycle for journeys that may otherwise be undertaken by car.
- There is a need to reduce car journeys in Harrow and increase active travel in order to improve people’s health and reduce the harms of motor traffic, such as air pollution, noise pollution and CO2 emissions.
- There is a major unmet need for a network of safe cycle routes in Harrow that are protected from fast or heavy motor traffic.
- A well-connected network is required for people to undertake end-to-end journeys by bike. This is even more important with the current COVID-19 pandemic and people’s reluctance to use public transport. Better cycle routes are essential to prevent an increase in car use as people resume normal activities
- The routes provide key links as part of the cycle network, and were chosen because they could be created quickly using temporary measures, reallocating road space that did not provide useful motor vehicle capacity.
What have the trials shown?
The key outcome of the trial is that it has been shown to be feasible to reallocate road space away from motorists to create protected cycle lanes along these sections, with negligible impact on motor traffic. The council’s monitoring report is available for download here.
Some sections of the routes have been used well and they provide a good experience for people, as they are direct and convenient. However, overall cycling numbers are still low, because the routes are incomplete and lack protection at junctions.
The council has been gathering feedback on the Commonplace website, to which we encourage people to submit positive comments. However, opponents of safer roads have posted multiple entries with non-specific negative feedback, and the proportion of negative and positive responses is in no way representative of the views of the general population. Recent surveys have shown that the majority of Londoners are in favour of creating protected cycle lanes.
At the TARSAP meeting on 22 April, the council will decide on the fate of these cycle lanes. The options are:
- To develop designs for permanent schemes, involving formal consultation, and keep the temporary lanes in place until the permanent scheme is built. This is the best option, as it will continue to provide protection for people cycling and will enable long term shift in travel behaviour.
- To remove the temporary lanes. WE DO NOT RECOMMENDED THIS for the following reasons:
- It means that the road will contravene design standards, (see LTN 1/20) and will put cyclists at risk from dangerous motor traffic. It could result in serious injuries or fatalities, which are preventable by keeping the lanes in place (cycle lanes reduce the odds of injury by 40-65% – link to study).
- It will make the route inaccessible to all but the most confident, athletic cyclists. It will discriminate against people with disabilities, children, older people and women, all of whom have just as much right as anyone else to be able to cycle in safety.
- It will not improve journey times for motorists, and will therefore not benefit anyone at all.
- It will mean that the Department for Transport money that was used to create the lanes will have been wasted with no benefit.
- It will reduce Harrow’s chance of further funding for road improvements. The borough of Kensington and Chelsea removed a cycle lane with no justification and TfL is forcing them to reinstate it (see news article). Sheepcote Road is a high priority route for cycle infrastructure in TfL’s Strategic Cycling Analysis. Harrow council needs to show compliance with the Mayoral Transport Strategy and demonstrate commitment to active travel to have a chance of gaining further funding.
- It will go against Harrow council’s own environmental and health policies.
- Even if permanent cycle lanes are created in this location in the future, in the meantime people will lose out on the opportunity to adopt healthy travel habits. Congestion, pollution, and diseases caused by physical inactivity will increase as lack of cycling infrastructure causes people to drive journeys that they could otherwise have cycled.
- It will demonstrate that Harrow councillors cannot be trusted to prioritise people’s health and safety.
How can I help?
The best way to get the message across is if lots of people say to the councillors who are responsible for making these decisions. Please email your local councillor and ask for these cycle lanes to be kept, and for more to be built to create a cycle network.